Guest viewing is limited

The Latest Author Email Grift

Accord64

Write well, edit often.
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
3,549
Reaction score
3,927
Email scams continue to evolve, growing more subtle and sophisticated. And AI only makes it worse.

I thought I'd share the latest email scam attempt I received, which came at me from a strange new angle.

I've received author email scams for many years, and most of the time they have been plainly obvious. Generic greetings, poor grammar and spelling, abrupt requests for sensitive information, over-sensationalized offers, and of course the telltale suspicious "click on me" link or attachments. And lately, some have been very entertaining while being obvious.

But the latest one was much more clever and low-key. Here's the email I received, word for word, not redacting who it's from as that's part of the play:

From: Charles Spencer <charlesspencer19009@gmail.com>

Hi [my first name], I had a few minutes free and thought I’d reach out and say hello. Since we’re both into writing, I figured it’d be nice to connect. I’m an author, historian, and broadcaster, Over the years, I’ve written several nonfiction books, including Blenheim, Killers of the King, and The White Ship. I also enjoy sharing stories through talks, events, and my podcast, The Rabbit Hole Detectives. History has always fascinated me, not just the major events, but the overlooked details behind people, places, and objects. I love uncovering those hidden stories and bringing them to life, whether I’m writing, speaking, or recording.
I’m really curious about your writing too. What kind of things do you like to work on? Do you normally publish traditionally, or do you handle your projects independently?

Okay, I thought it a bit odd that any author would reach out to me out of the blue and not mention where/how he ran across me. But the message lacked any of the typical telltale scam verbiage or attempt to sell me on something. Could it be authentic?

I looked up this author and his works. He's a real person who writes primarily in the non-fiction history genre, and seems pretty well read. He's also published through a respectable UK publisher, as well as hosts a real podcast, and is a lecturer. I really couldn't find an angle of what he might be trying to peddle. Then I dove more into his background.

And then it came to the surface - mainly because I'm not a well-read non-fiction reader. Charles Spenser is the younger brother of Princess Diana!

At this point my suspicions deepened, but I really wasn't ready to write him completely off. Yes, I wondered how in the world did I, a not so well-known fiction novelist, get on his radar? We come from very different places.

So, my wife had a great idea: Use AI to sniff out AI. We had AI write a reply to him under the suspicion that he could be an imposter. Here's the reply I sent:

Hi Charles,

Thank you for your message. Before continuing, could you please confirm your identity and provide an official contact method (such as a verified website or professional email domain)? I want to ensure this conversation is genuine and secure.

Best regards,

[My name]

I received this reply the next day:

Hi [my first name],
I understand your caution. I can confirm I’m real, Here is my official email: pr@charles-spencer.com.

if you’d like to continue the conversation. I'd be glad to hear from you.

I confirmed (on the official Charles Spencer author website) that the correct official email was given. Now it was time to complete the authenticity loop. So, I sent the following email (with a copy of the entire email message chain) to the official email address:

Hello,

I'm forwarding an email correspondence for verification.

If this is indeed from Charles, thank you for your understanding that this confirmation is necessary. I regularly receive spam/scam emails which continue to grow more sophisticated.

Best regards,
[My name]

Two days later, I received the following message:

From: Charles Spencer <charlesspencer19009@gmail.com>

Hi [my first name, not capitalized this time],
I hope you’re doing well. Did you get a chance to read the message I sent earlier?

Noting the return email address, I laughed and immediately replied:

Hi,

Yes, I did receive your last message. I'm waiting for you to reply to my email that I sent to your official email address for verification.

Best regards,
[my name]

Two days have gone by with no reply. Busted!

I can't say where it would have gone if I had just accepted his identity and started corresponding. Part of me wishes that I did, just to find out where it would go and what the scam really was.

But the bottom line is to NEVER trust this type of contact. Always, ALWAYS verify, and don't feel bad for doing so. Or just simply ignore them. But where's the fun in that? 😏
 
Thanks for the heads up on this! Yes, scammers are getting more sophisticated, especially with the use of AI. I'm glad you sniffed them out before any damage was done!
 
Email scams continue to evolve, growing more subtle and sophisticated. And AI only makes it worse.

I thought I'd share the latest email scam attempt I received, which came at me from a strange new angle.

I've received author email scams for many years, and most of the time they have been plainly obvious. Generic greetings, poor grammar and spelling, abrupt requests for sensitive information, over-sensationalized offers, and of course the telltale suspicious "click on me" link or attachments. And lately, some have been very entertaining while being obvious.

But the latest one was much more clever and low-key. Here's the email I received, word for word, not redacting who it's from as that's part of the play:



Okay, I thought it a bit odd that any author would reach out to me out of the blue and not mention where/how he ran across me. But the message lacked any of the typical telltale scam verbiage or attempt to sell me on something. Could it be authentic?

I looked up this author and his works. He's a real person who writes primarily in the non-fiction history genre, and seems pretty well read. He's also published through a respectable UK publisher, as well as hosts a real podcast, and is a lecturer. I really couldn't find an angle of what he might be trying to peddle. Then I dove more into his background.

And then it came to the surface - mainly because I'm not a well-read non-fiction reader. Charles Spenser is the younger brother of Princess Diana!

At this point my suspicions deepened, but I really wasn't ready to write him completely off. Yes, I wondered how in the world did I, a not so well-known fiction novelist, get on his radar? We come from very different places.

So, my wife had a great idea: Use AI to sniff out AI. We had AI write a reply to him under the suspicion that he could be an imposter. Here's the reply I sent:



I received this reply the next day:



I confirmed (on the official Charles Spencer author website) that the correct official email was given. Now it was time to complete the authenticity loop. So, I sent the following email (with a copy of the entire email message chain) to the official email address:



Two days later, I received the following message:



Noting the return email address, I laughed and immediately replied:



Two days have gone by with no reply. Busted!

I can't say where it would have gone if I had just accepted his identity and started corresponding. Part of me wishes that I did, just to find out where it would go and what the scam really was.

But the bottom line is to NEVER trust this type of contact. Always, ALWAYS verify, and don't feel bad for doing so. Or just simply ignore them. But where's the fun in that? 😏
Well, the fact that it is so out of the blue from princess Diana's little bror would be a red flag for me. 😂
 
Since we're talking about AI-assisted spam, I asked AI what's going on here. It's a fascinating read:

Because that email is engineered, not written.

What you’re seeing is a social-engineering template optimized for writers—especially writers who are:
  • hungry for validation
  • uncertain about publishing paths
  • proud of their craft but unsure of industry norms
  • open to “connections” that feel collegial, not transactional
Here’s why this exact approach works so well.



1. It opens with​

“I had a few minutes free and thought I’d reach out and say hello.”

This does three things at once:
  • Signals casualness (not a pitch)
  • Implies scarcity (you’re worth interrupting their day)
  • Creates a parasocial tone (“we’re already acquaintances”)

Scammers know writers are used to rejection, not interest. So even mild interest feels warm.



2. It establishes​

“I’m an author, historian, and broadcaster…”

Then it name-drops real, respectable credentials.


In your example, it’s especially insidious because it impersonates an actual, well-known historian and podcaster (Richard Morris / The Rabbit Hole Detectives vibe).

Why this matters:
  • Writers are trained to respect bylines, books, and platforms
  • Authority short-circuits skepticism
  • Most people won’t fact-check unless something feels off

This is classic ethos hijacking.



3. It mirrors the writer’s identity​

“Since we’re both into writing…”

This is identity bonding, not networking.

They’re not saying:
“I want something from you.”

They’re saying:
“I am one of you.”

For wannabe (and even seasoned) writers, that hits deep:
  • “Someone serious sees me as a peer”
  • “I belong in this room”

That emotional payoff is the hook.


4. It avoids the pitch on purpose​

Notice what’s missing:
  • No offer
  • No link
  • No ask
Yet.

This is slow-burn trust building.
The scam doesn’t work if it smells like marketing.

The real goals come later:
  • vanity publishing offers
  • paid “collaborations”
  • introductions to fake agents/editors
  • credential laundering (“featured alongside…”)



5. The final question is a trap (a polite one)​

“Do you normally publish traditionally, or independently?”

This isn’t curiosity. It’s segmentation.

Your answer tells them:
  • how experienced you are
  • how vulnerable you might be
  • which scam funnel to route you into
Traditional → fake agent / insider connection
Indie → services, marketing, exposure scams

Either way, they win if you respond.



6. Why writers are especially targeted​

Writers combine three traits scammers love:
  1. Ego sensitivity – we crave being seen for our work
  2. Asymmetric power – gatekeepers control access
  3. Solo labor – fewer peers to sanity-check opportunities
Add ADHD and novelty + validation can hit even harder.

Scammers don’t need to fool everyone.
They only need to fool the hopeful.



The tell, distilled​

If you ever see an email that:
  • feels oddly generic and flattering
  • establishes authority without proof links
  • asks about your publishing path early
  • avoids a clear reason for contacting you
…it’s not networking.

It’s credential cosplay.
 
To follow up, I asked how we can avoid these scammers. (We've already seen some great examples up-thread.)

The short answer is: don’t try to be smarter than the scam. Build filters that make the scam fail automatically.
Here’s a writer-specific, practical playbook you can actually use.


1. Assume​

Real professionals are:
  • specific
  • busy
  • contextual

Scammers are:
  • warm
  • vague
  • flattering before knowing your work

Rule of thumb:
If someone praises you before referencing anything you’ve written, pause.
Legit outreach sounds like:
“I read your piece on X and had a question about Y.”

Not:
“I love writing too. Tell me about yourself.”



2. Force specificity early (this breaks most scams)​

Reply — if you reply at all — with one clarifying question:

“Which piece of mine prompted you to reach out?”

Scammers rely on momentum.
Specificity kills momentum.
  • Real people answer instantly.
  • Scammers stall, deflect, or disappear.



3. Verify​

Anyone can list books. Fewer can behave like the person they claim to be.

Quick checks:
  • Does the sender’s email domain match the real person?
  • Does their writing voice match public samples?
  • Do they reference current work or just a résumé?

If they’re impersonating someone real:
  • Real professionals don’t cold-email peers from Gmail accounts.
  • They don’t “have a few minutes free” and write mini-bios.


4. Treat publishing-path questions as a red flag 🚩


“Do you publish traditionally or independently?”

That question has nothing to do with conversation.
It has everything to do with routing you into a funnel.

Real writers ask about:
  • themes
  • process
  • problems
  • craft
Scammers ask about:
  • format
  • distribution
  • control
  • ownership


5. Never move platforms quickly​


A classic move is:

“I don’t check email often — can we continue on WhatsApp/Telegram?”

This is how:
  • accountability disappears
  • paper trails vanish
  • pressure tactics escalate

Rule:
If they push to move off email early, you stop responding.



6. Delay is your superpower​

Scammers want speed:
  • quick replies
  • emotional momentum
  • urgency
You want time.

Let messages sit 24–48 hours.
Re-read them cold.
If it still feels legit later, proceed.

Most scams collapse under patience.


7. Remember the uncomfortable truth​

Here’s the hardest but most protective belief to internalize:

No serious professional needs you to decide quickly.
  • Agents don’t rush.
  • Editors don’t pressure.
  • Publishers don’t cold-pitch writers they’ve never read.
Urgency is not opportunity.
Urgency is cover.



8. Build a personal “no by default” rule​

This is especially important for writers with ADHD or big creative hearts.

Try this internal script:
“If it’s real, it will survive my skepticism.”

You’re not being rude.
You’re being professional.



9. Use community as a firewall​

Before engaging:
  • Google the pitch language
  • Ask other writers
  • Post anonymized excerpts in trusted forums
Scams repeat because they scale.
Community breaks scale.



10. The mindset shift that protects everything​


The biggest protection isn’t technical.

It’s this:
Your work has value even if no one is offering you anything today.

Scammers exploit the gap between:
  • “I know I’m good”
  • “No one has validated me yet”

Close that gap internally, and their leverage disappears.
 
@Johne - that AI breakdown was a fascinating read and pretty much dead-on. More and more of my scam emails are starting to look like this.
 
(Also, love that you talked about this with your wife, and listened to her ideas!)
 
Wow! Fascinating and scary! Thanks so much, Accord and Johne! 👍
 
Just reading that and realizing I might have come across as a scammer to some people... And I've probably written people off that meant no harm either.

I haven't gotten writing related scams yet, but I get other scam texts occasionally. Seems like there have been more people pretending to be someone you know trying to find out who you really are. Anyone know anything about those?
 
But the message lacked any of the typical telltale scam verbiage or attempt to sell me on something. Could it be authentic?
In my experience, the asking detailed questions to a stranger is a telltale sign of either a scammer or someone hunting low hanging fruit for their multilevel marketing "business". I recently cleared a few dozen facebook messages from my account that were all now deleted accounts that had reached out to have a friendly conversation about what type of author I am and what I was working on, etc. I've toyed around with a few like you did and everytime I stop giving them answers, the conversation dries up and the account is deleted shortly after.
 
There's one problem with this scenario.

I have two separate email addresses. The "official" one is author@h********.com. The second one is my original email address that I use for all my background business dealings. Trusted people usually hear from me on the second email address.

I've pretty much figure out a fool-proof way of detecting AI scams. My company name is HPH Lore Forge LLC. Bulk scammers locate this either from public records or from Amazon. The AI can't tell the difference between Herman and HPH, so it uses HPH as my author name.

Virtually EVERY scam email starts out with something like, "Greetings HPH!" I chuckle for a moment, then send it to trash.

AI has created a lot of really low-effort scammers. My inbox has been flooded with them for the last several months.
 
Last edited:
@Jeff Potts - I strongly recommend editing your post to remove the actual email address. Spammers love to crawl sites and harvest email addresses. You might be receiving a lot more AI scam messages than you planned for! :D
 
@Jeff Potts - I strongly recommend editing your post to remove the actual email address. Spammers love to crawl sites and harvest email addresses. You might be receiving a lot more AI scam messages than you planned for! :D
Done.

It really doesn't matter because I'll only answer to people I know are on my store's e-mail list.
 
Back
Top