For more info enter my name in Google - Renato L. Porchetta

[Renato]

God in all and all in God

[christianauthor]

What may I ask was your point?:confused:

[shemale]

hi. i did something quite stupid. I was bored so i put Renato L. Porchetta into google. you have 258 sites listed to your name. i lookedthrough them and half of them are not even english! Bye =;@}

[Renato]

Penn State University January 2, 2005
Dear All,
I would like all readers from a deper information contained in following article.
And perhaps, why not? reflect on the issue of how conflicts are generated in the religious essence by the erronueous standing of Darwinism, Quantum Mechanics, the theory of relativity of Einstein and the legacy of TIME.
This article is concise and -communication efficient- because it addresses deep and important issues in just less than 900 words. I think
Happy Holidays.
########### Article (start) ################

Re: Darwinism

State College December 29, 2004
Phil,

You know my position: many scientific claims are fraudulent because the trendy scientist,
philosopher, thinker and theologian do not acknowledge the spirituality of the inspiration
and the responsibility for coherency within the creative process.

In fact, as you know by now, I call this dynamic blend made of inspiration and creativity:
"Human Intelligence," which in turn produces all the arts and information, science included.

Men and Women without the justification of an emotional-intelligence, without the justification of
a Spiritual_Within take a very dangerous positions.

With blasphemous violence used in wars some Men and Women are already challenging the
fundamental principles of love. Eventually this violence which is the action sprung from madness
will convince this type of individual to increase the challenge prevail on God's Perfection.

Perfection is well illustrated by the synchronicity supported by many philosophers and particularly
strongly by Aristotle reinforced by Lavoisier and the Zen philosophy.
Therefore for this very reason of challenging "perfection" many scientists claim becomes
faulty but audiences of scholars find strong reasons to oppose the misjudgements of science.

Then I also find as a secondary social effect, that in many cases these "misjudgements" are
part of an architecture or an orchestration to re_direct sums of monies to self-serving
programs in the direction of the supremacy of a market.

I also witness that many corrupted scientific claims aim at marketing rather than the
deepening of the truth of knowledge. Quantum Mechanics is a typical example of this.

However I don't find flaws in the understanding of some of Darwin's theory. And I am
not opposed to the fact that the physiological cycle of living organisms allows the
perpetuation of life. And, perhaps this is the only way I accept the -half- mentioned theory of
evolution.

The other half which I found missing but common to many other scientific claims is a
rationale which employs the fraudulent use of time. Einstein reigns in this fraudulent
standing where we find the calendar time is used in replacement of natural
phenomenology.

During a scientific rationale calendar time, which is a convention is assumed erroneously as
a natural phenomena: this is a mistake which allows the scientist the liberty of weird mad
conclusions.

The only value of time is the perfection of the mind illustrated by the synchronicity of
Aristotle.
Time is synchronization and nothing else.
Synchronization is perfection and perfection is conducive to spiritual harmony.
The current scientist opposes PERFECTION and opposes the spiritual nature of the
human intelligence and consequently opposes God.

Therefore if the modern scientist is not aware that all scientific experiences are seen
because of an inborn human-intelligence whatever the scientist claims for himself/herself is
only half of a truth.
Half of the truth is not the whole truth therefore the promise of a "WHOLE" fails and it
remains that half of the truth is a lie.

Referring back to Darwinism, there is nothing wrong within the information in the ape-to-man
theory nor in the fact that one day I would grow wings because I would become an angel. I think.

In tune with the received article at the same time I neither find wrong to feature pictures of
giraffes stretching their necks to feed high off of trees nor I find wrong if Darwinists want to teach
that whales, which are mammals, evolved from black bears swimming with their mouths open.
However I understand that scientists will suffer embarrassments when a scientific theory
are presented without a sound validity.
This is also the case of the Darwinists like many others who use erroneously the featuring time
rather than inspiration for the completion of the scientific information.

We withness the attempt of evolution as a theory attempting to identifying the origin of life.
This idea is foolish to start with.
Can we prevent men being fools? The answer to this question is:"no."
Men and Women are entitled to their own stupidity and madness as an experience which
is a springboard for corrections and learning. At times human madness seems unavoidable.

However, there are no origins and no ends to life simply because life is perpetual dynamic
motion. Perpetual means eternal and many individual don't like to accept the idea of
"something" being eternal because they know better and they are going to prevail in the
challenge to God's ETERNAL PERFECTION.

Referring back to the article you sent I think that children should be taught the
spiritual value in the arts as a by-product of good compositions and semantics.
So that typical schoolchildren full of wonder would live in a world best described as a
marvelous work of art.
The snowflakes that grace us at Christmas time typify the artistic beauty that bestows joy
on all ages but all this is not the employment of madness but the employment of human
cohesive and coherent intelligence.
The efficiency of the artistic message within the arts depends on the enlightenment of
the human mind and not on the blurring or darkness of it.
Be in good spirit and let's remember what Buddha proposes with the following question:
"Can anyone support or promote peace, love and intelligence with anger and lying?"
R.

PS: I put a new "interactive-button" at bottom of my Penn State web-site portfolio.
It is mouse-clickable and I labeled the button "Applied_Theology".
The content is strong and direct and describes clearly the link between science and
God.
www.personal.psu.edu/rlp188

################### Article (end) ###################
:)