PDA

View Full Version : Suspension of Disbelief


DrRita
06-03-2007, 12:40 PM
Whether novel or short story, the writer’s highest goal is create a unique and exciting piece of literature that is anything but ho-hum. I've critiqued a number of works on this forum and others, in my writing groups and for friends/family and have seen a reoccurring problem (one I've dealt with myself) in the works of new writers—the desire to write something “different.” All of us want to create that unique piece of fiction which establishes us as an above average writer who knows how to create an extraordinary reading experience and isn't afraid to break the rules to do it. It's an admirable goal, one all writers should pursue.

But here's the problem . . .

One cannot create a piece of work that bends/breaks rules, goes outside the box, and in truly innovative and unique if one has not learned to stick to the rules first. Discipline is the task master of the greatest artists. In art, dance, music and literature, you cannot name one of the greats who haven’t learned his/her craft first by following the rules and adhering to the principles and guidelines before breaking them.

I started dance when I was four. At ten I was still learning the dance but some of it had become second nature. However, it wasn’t until I was in high school that I began to choreograph dances that were unique and innovative. By then I could execute the basics with mastery and had earned the right to break them.

In writing there is one guiding principle that should never be compromised nor ignored for the sake of “art.” It called the willingness to suspend disbelief. Writers are forever bound to the creation of works that will lure the reader into that place where they are willing to enter the world you’ve created with trust and anticipation that you will take them on a marvelous journey. Here’s what Wikipedia has to say:

"Suspension of disbelief is an aesthetic theory intended to characterize people's relationships to art. It refers to the alleged willingness of a reader or viewer to accept as true the premises of a work of fiction, even if they are fantastic, impossible, or contradictory. It also refers to the willingness of the audience to overlook the limitations of a medium, so that these do not interfere with the acceptance of those premises. According to the theory, suspension of disbelief is a quid pro quo: the audience agrees to provisionally suspend their judgment in exchange for the promise of entertainment."

It takes skill, wisdom, an understanding of the art form and mastery to keep the reader in that state and lead them through our unusual plot twists, character anomalies, and misuses of language, dialog and the like. Until one has learned HOW to write according the rules, it is unwise to deviate. To do so jars the reader from their position of trust and suspension and makes them look around, scratch their head and say, “What the heck was that?” Worst case scenario: they put our work down and call us a “liar.”
So . . . my advice? Work hard at mastering the disciplines, write true to the rules of literature and wait for the time when it has become second nature before trying that new and innovative style, story or plot twist. Hopefully by then your readers will have trusted you enough to follow you on to places “where no one has gone before.”

For further reading in Wikipedia here's the link: Article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_of_disbelief)

ldhix
06-03-2007, 10:58 PM
Thank you for your post. I will quit trying to be cool and deep. Just kidding.

Soloman in Ecclesiastes, says that there is nothing new under the sun anyway.

DrRita
06-04-2007, 06:37 AM
Thanks Idhix,
Though there may be nothing new, there are certainly as many new and unique perspectives as there are stars. Please, keep on being cool and deep . . . just do it well!! God Bless you in your writing.

Rick
06-10-2007, 03:35 PM
DrRita,

I believe your advice is solid and sound. Within the accepted rules of good literature, there are still many dimensions of freedom to express originality and to create plots that are new and fresh and capable of presenting the reader with completely new thoughts, viewpoints and understandings.

The time accepted rules of literature are really nothing more than the building materials of our trade. From there, creativity and imagination are our only limits.



to the readers new ideas and scnearios can take the reader into realms of thought

ldhix
06-10-2007, 03:51 PM
Thanks Idhix,
Though there may be nothing new, there are certainly as many new and unique perspectives as there are stars. Please, keep on being cool and deep . . . just do it well!! God Bless you in your writing.


Allright, if you will twist my arm I will continue to stay cool. Deep? hmm have to go to Starbucks and sit outside and drink my latte for that. LOL

I am soon to post my first chapter to the critique board.

Hopefully it'll go ok.

Naomi Musch
06-15-2007, 09:08 PM
DrRita,
Thanks for another well written, right on piece of advice!

DrRita
06-15-2007, 09:19 PM
Thank you for your kind words, Naomi. My honor.

miranda119
07-03-2007, 01:18 AM
One cannot create a piece of work that bends/breaks rules, goes outside the box, and in truly innovative and unique if one has not learned to stick to the rules first. Discipline is the task master of the greatest artists. In art, dance, music and literature, you cannot name one of the greats who haven’t learned his/her craft first by following the rules and adhering to the principles and guidelines before breaking them.

This is exactly what my awesome teacher Mr. G. in high school told us. To break the rules, you HAVE to know the rules.

Well put, Dr. Rita. Thanks for sharing.

Miranda :)

lynnmosher
07-06-2007, 09:37 AM
DrRita, As a newbie, I am ever-ready to learn from those who have ploughed through the field of the basics, sowed steadily the seeds of perseverance, implemented the tools that help to weed out and increase their productivity, and ultimately produce the fruits of their harvest. We who come along behind are blessed to pluck that fruit and savor the flavor. Thanks for your article.

Lynn

DrRita
07-06-2007, 09:45 AM
Lynn
Thank you for your kind response. Yes, it's very nice to glean from a seasoned farmer. I've done so many, many times in my writing career. And now I even have a few paltry offerings. Thanks for reading.

VWeathers
07-17-2007, 03:41 PM
Ok...please don't throw eggs at me, but what if you don't know the literary rules?:confused:

I'm learning here. I know about POVs and MCs and not jumping in and out of heads...NOW, but I didn't 10 days ago.

I know a little about grammar and that is part of it. But it seems there are a lot more rules that I haven't read yet. How can I know what I am breaking if I don't know what they are?

I imagine there are many would be writers who found their passion for it long after their school / college days are behind them. Some seem irritated with our mistakes which seem elementary and obvious. But we all have to learn and some have to learn on their own.

We learn by having more learned writer's critiquing our work. When someone actually takes the time to tell you not just what is wrong but why it is wrong that is helpful to someone like me.

I just learned the simplest thing today from reading these threads. It was something I had never heard. It was regarding changing POVs successfully by leaving an extra blank line. To a lot of you that's "well Duh!" :rolleyes: To me that was a golden nugget!

One of the critiques I received was that I jumped in and out of people's heads too much. Yes, I was a POV jumper! :eek: But now I can be free from that because now I know it is wrong to do and I can change.!thumbsup!

lynnmosher
07-17-2007, 04:27 PM
The only thing to do is read - read - read! Not only books on fiction and nonfiction but also books that give you the basics on writing, grammar, structure, etc. That's how I have learned - and am still learning. Start a new thread and we'll get some good suggestions.

Lynn

revterry
07-28-2007, 11:43 AM
When I'm writing a fiction story, I try my very best to not describe something that is real in a fictional way. In a story I recently wrote I referred to an actual place and I added details regarding the place by going to a site that described the location and I used those actual descriptions in my story. Someone reading the story that would be familiar with the location would be able to allow their own memories of the place to make my story even more enjoyable. I believe that the more someone can nod their head up and down as they are reading the story, the more interesting the story becomes. James A. Michener is absolutely my most favorite author. His ability to blend fiction and reality was incredible. I try my best to do that.